-
China Local
- Eighteen Songs
- Qingming
- Hou Wu Walkabout
- Eight-sided Hall of the Huangshan Chen family
- Headquarters of the Taiping Assistant King
- Lingxia Tang Village
- Old City of Wuyi
- Seven Pillar Hall
- Shantouxia Village
- Shanxia Bao Village
- Siping Village
- Upper Tang Village
- Yanfu Monastery
- Yao Village
- Zhuge Village
- Bailu Walkabout
- Fangyan Walkabout
- Dayuan Walkabout
- Tangxi Walkabout
- Yuyuan Walkabout
- Wenlou Walkabout
- Browse Items
- Browse Exhibits
- About
- Browse Catalogue
- Documentation
- Local History in Jinhua
- Zhiyan Village
- Lu Family
- Guodong Village
- Tianning Monastery in Jinhua
- Jinhua Prefectural City God
Jinhua Population Table
Jinhua Population Figures
Wu Songdi 吳 松 弟 and Peter K. Bol
The population figures for Jinhua prior to 1820 were gathered in the context of systems for registering and taxing households rather than as part of a census aimed at counting the entire population. As such they are indicative of relative population size, the local government’s effectiveness in registering population, and the kinds of tax returns that could be expected from the place. The spatial extent of Jinhua changed very little between 696 and the 1950s, thus figures for Jinhua 金 華 (and its predecessors, Wu zhou 婺 州 and Dongyang 東 陽 ) from before 696 are not comparable because they pertain to larger areas.
The reestablishment of a centralized empire in the Sui and Tang periods resulted in rapid population growth in what was then called Wu zhou, the combined result of an inflow of colonists from the north and the registration of native inhabitants. Modern scholarly opinion discounts the figures from 806-820 and 980. Although population growth was affected by rebellions and civil wars in the ninth and tenth centuries, the lower numbers given for these years actually reflect massive under-registration. The could be due to the ineffectiveness of local government in registering taxpayers, and to under-reporting by local government in an effort to reduce its tax obligation to higher administrative levels during a period of weak central control. From this perspective the 1011 figure reflects increased effectiveness of local government rather than unusual population growth.
There was continued population growth in the twelfth century, for although part of Wu zhou was occupied and plundered by Fang La’s方腊 rebels in 1120, it was also well behind the front lines when the Jin dynasty captured the North China plain in 1126 and the border moved south; the region thus became a destination for refugees. Its proximity by river and road to the Southern Song capital at Hangzhou also brought economic advantages that allowed for greater population growth. Growth continued in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, despite the capture of Wu zhou in 1276 by the Mongol Yuan dynasty and by Zhu Yuanzhang in 1358. This growth stands in contrast to the empire as a whole, for which figures show a 40% loss in population by 1391.
Official population figures from the Ming dynasty after 1391 are not included here; the decrease and stabilization of the population they appear to show are in fact a shrinking and then fixing of the tax base. Population figures for Jinhua for the period between 1391 and 1820 must be estimated based on rates of growth. Reportedly, however, as many as 200,000 lives were lost during the Qing conquest in the 1640s. In the 1860s the Taiping rebels occupied Jinhua and there was again major destruction.
Date |
Period date |
Households |
Persons |
Rate of increase |
source |
280 |
西晋 太康初年 |
12,000 |
|
|
晋書·地理志 |
464 |
刘宋 大明八年 |
16,022 |
107,965 |
|
宋書·州郡志 |
609 |
隋大業五年 |
19,805 |
|
|
隋書·地理志 |
639 |
唐 貞觀十三年 |
37,819 |
228,990 |
|
旧唐書·地理志 |
713-741 |
唐 開元年間 |
99,409 |
|
|
元和郡縣志 卷 26 |
742 |
唐 天宝元年 |
144,086 |
707,152 |
23.5 |
新、旧唐書地理志 |
806-820 |
唐 元和年間 |
48,036 |
|
|
元和郡縣志 卷 26 |
980 |
北宋 太平興国五年 |
33,046[i] |
|
|
太平寰宇記记卷 97 |
1011 |
北宋 大中祥符四年[ii] |
134,985 |
|
|
金華府志 (1578) 5.9a-13b |
1078 |
北宋 元丰元年 |
138,097 |
|
0.2 |
元丰九域志 |
1102 |
北宋 崇宁元年 |
134,080 |
|
-1.2 |
宋史·地理志 |
1131-1162 |
南宋 紹興中 |
154,329 |
|
3.2[iii] |
金華府志 (1578) 5.9a-13b |
1290 |
元 至元二十七年 |
221118 |
1,077,540 |
2.5 |
元史· 地理志[iv] |
1368-98 |
明 洪武间 |
256,000+[v] |
|
|
《明英宗实录》 卷 85 |
1391 |
明 洪武二十四年 |
226200 |
1,103,000 |
|
Wu Songdi estimate[vi] |
1391 |
明 洪武二十四年 |
255,000 |
1,242,650 |
|
Bol estimate[vii] |
1627 |
明 天啟七年 |
|
1,890,000 |
|
Wu Songdi estimate[viii] |
1820 |
清 嘉庆二十五年 |
|
2,549,446 |
|
Liang Fangzhong, Zhongguo Lidai hukou tiandi tianfu tongji, p. 275 |
1953 |
|
622,950 |
2,362,007 |
|
National census |
2001 |
|
|
4,479,400 |
|
Jinhua Municipal Gov’t. www.jinhua.gov.cn/jhgk/jhgk.htm |
[i] Following Wu Songdi, Zhongguo renkou shi 中国人口史, vol 3: Liao Song Jin Yuan shiqi renkou shi, ed. Ge Jianxiong (Shanghai: Fudan daxue chuban she, 2000), 3.4 Table 4-2, note 21. The Taiping huanyu ji figure follows the 33046 figure in the manuscript copy edition rather than the obviously mistaken 3046 in the Jinling shuju edition.
[ii] Wu Songdi, Zhongguo renkou shi 3.11 Table 11-2, for dating to 1101.
[iii] The estimated growth rate is calculated based on the midway point of 1146.
[iv] The Yongzheng Zhejiang Tongzhi 雍正浙江通志 jn. 73 citing a previous edition gives 216,228 households and 1,088,569 persons.
[v] Cao Shuji, Zhongguo renkou shi, vol 4, p. 140, citing a report by the provincial official Huang Ze 泽的 in 1441. in the Veritable Records, Yingzong reign 明英宗实录, jn 85.
[vi] The prefectural gazetteer does not give a total for Jinhua population in 1391. Wu Songdi uses known population figures for five counties to arrive at this estimate. In 1472 and 1953 these five (Dongyang, Lanxi, Wuyi, Yiwu, and Pujiang) had 66.9-67.3 percent of the Jinhua population, thus arriving at 226,200. However, this estimate allows for a major discrepancy in the recorded figures for the Lanxi population. Lanxi xianzhi (1510 ed. Rpt. 1614) 2.39a, gives 59,427 households and 232,999 persons for 1391. Wu follows the 1606 edition which gives 39,527. However, in my view we should accept the 59,427 figure, although it represents a nearly fifty percent increase in population since 1290, because a) it is in accord with the Lanxi figures for 1403, 1412, and 1422, b) three other counties also show population growth between 1290 and 1391, and there is no reason to think Lanxi population declined, c) Lanxi’s location made it a possible destination for war refugees from Hangzhou in the 1350s and 1360s, which would account for a sudden increase in population and explain the low household/person ration of 3.9.
[vii] See note 6.
[viii] Based on the assumption of a growth rate of 2.3%.